Pacific Market International (PMI), the maker of the popular Stanley Tumblers, is back in the headlines for yet another lawsuit, and this time, it’s about the very name “Stanley.”
The Stanley Quencher, which became one of 2023's most coveted promotional items, has sparked a major legal battle over 'Stanley' between PMI and Stanley Black & Decker, a toolmaker with a nearly two-century-old legacy.
Stanley Black & Decker Takes Legal Action
At the heart of the lawsuit is the use of the “Stanley” name, which Stanley Black & Decker claims is causing confusion and harm to its reputation. The company accuses PMI of using the Stanley name in ways that breach a decades-old agreement. According to the lawsuit, PMI’s marketing of its insulated drinkware, which includes the Stanley Quencher, has been misleading to consumers and damaging to Stanley Black & Decker’s brand, especially given previous negative press about the brand’s association with lead poisoning and burn risks.
The lawsuit also claims that PMI violated a nearly 60-year-old agreement that limited the use of the “Stanley” name to certain types of insulated containers. In 2012, PMI and its predecessor signed a new agreement, which set restrictions on how the Stanley name could be used. Specifically, PMI agreed not to use the name as a company name or division and to always include its full corporate name with the brand. Stanley Black & Decker argues that PMI has repeatedly violated these terms.
As a result, the toolmaker is asking the court to stop PMI from using the “Stanley” name and to pay unspecified monetary damages.
PMI’s Response
Not backing down, PMI has fired back, claiming that Stanley Black & Decker’s lawsuit is an unwarranted attack on its right to use the “Stanley” name, which it has used for over a century. PMI's President, Matt Navarro, defended the company’s position, emphasizing that it has been using the Stanley brand for food and beverage products well before the toolmaker’s recent legal action.
Navarro stressed that Stanley Black & Decker’s attempt to lay claim to the Stanley name is an effort to capitalize on PMI’s long-standing success. PMI vowed to vigorously defend its right to continue using its “incontestable” federal trademark and stated that it is committed to protecting the Stanley brand at all costs.
Legal and PR Battles
This isn’t the first legal hurdle for PMI. Last month, the company was hit with a class-action lawsuit over a lid defect in the Stanley Quencher, which led to the recall of 2.6 million mugs. Despite this, PMI has already won some legal victories. For example, a district judge recently dismissed a lawsuit that accused PMI of failing to warn customers about lead in its products. PMI acknowledged the presence of lead in its vacuum insulation but maintained that the metal is safely contained within a stainless-steel layer, ensuring it doesn’t come into contact with users.
Intellectual Property in the Promotional Industry
This legal battle shines a light on the crucial role intellectual property (IP) plays in the promotional products industry. For companies like PMI, protecting trademarks, patents, and copyrights is a top priority to safeguard their reputation and innovation. As the promotional products industry continues to grow, keeping an eye on IP rights is critical for both suppliers and distributors.
Legal experts, like patent attorney Justin Miller, stress the importance of filing for patents early to prevent losing rights or limiting potential legal remedies. A landmark case in 2018 highlighted the importance of protecting one’s brand, as ETS Express won a lawsuit against S’well Bottle for alleged trademark infringement.
However, companies must also be cautious not to infringe on others’ IP. Whether designing new products or fulfilling custom orders, distributors must be vigilant about avoiding the use of protected logos, trademarks, and character likenesses.
What’s at Stake?
As this legal saga continues, the implications for PMI and Stanley Black & Decker, as well as for the wider promotional industry, are significant. The outcome of the lawsuit could shape future branding and IP protection practices for companies across various sectors. For now, PMI is standing firm, ready to defend its use of the Stanley name, while Stanley Black & Decker pushes to maintain control over its century-old brand.
In the world of promotional products, this case is a reminder of the delicate balance between creativity, branding, and the protection of intellectual property. With billions of dollars at stake, businesses in the promotional space must remain proactive and informed about the legal complexities surrounding their trademarks and patents.
Comments